More spent on tests than on textbooks

16th January 1998 at 00:00
Nicholas Pyke reports on the Liberal Democrats' searing attack on a 'high-cost, low-value system of obsolete information'

Three times as much is spent on tests for seven-year-olds as on books to help them learn the basics, according to Don Foster, the Lib Dems education spokesman.

The key stage 1 tests in English and maths are "a high-cost, low-value system of obsolete information," said Mr Foster, speaking at last week's Association for Science Education conference in Liverpool.

Last year's tests for seven-year-olds cost pound;pound;36 per pupil. Only pound;12.81 per child was spent on books.

"The book figures really are very worrying," said John Davies, director of the Educational Publishers Council. Last month, a survey by the council showed that overall spending on school books is falling.

The Government has allocated pound;19 million to support primary-school literacy. This amounts to about pound;4 to pound;5 a child.

"This should improve the situation," said Mr Davies. "But it won't bring it any where near the required levels suggested by the Book Trust."

Last year the Book Trust recommended that schools spend pound;45 per child per year on primary-school books.

Mr Foster, who was presenting the TESPfizer Science Teacher of the Year award, said the national curriculum was overloaded and overprescriptive. He also called for a shift in spending from secondary schools to the primary and nursery sectors.

"We should be spending some of our existing money on providing support for the parents of one to three-year-olds," he said. "Maybe we should have our own key stage for the early years. We're going to have to consider reallocating secondary-school resources to some of the primary schools."

* The Government should delay its plans for a teacher-training national curriculum so that science teachers have time to debate the content, says the Association for Science Education.

Dr Mary Ratcliffe, immediate past president of the ASE, said that proposals drawn up by Government advisers appear to be simplistic.

"It's nothing like as straightforward as the Teacher Training Agency's plans suggest," she said. "They assume that there's a straightforward relationship between understanding and your ability to teach.

"There's a very interesting and important debate to be had. But I don't think it's taking place."

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today