My years of experience count for nothing

5th November 2004 at 00:00
I read with interest of the plight of Tristram Jones-Parry, the head of one of our top private schools, and David Wolfe, a physics professor, who were barred from teaching in state secondary schools ("Too posh for the state?", TES, October, 15); Mr Jones-Parry because he does not have qualified teaching status and Mr Wolfe because he does not have GCSE maths (and because of this, presumably does not have QTS either).

For many years I taught information and communications technology and maths in further and higher education, and to sixth-formers from local schools.I have a 2:1 honours degree, postgraduate diploma, Cert Ed (PCET), but not QTS.

I tried to take up secondary school teaching but, of course, I was barred (despite the fact that schools were keen to employ me). The Teacher Training Agency advised me to join the Graduate Teaching Programme for a year, followed by another year as a newly-qualified teacher.

I am 55, and the thought of retraining for two years to do something I have been doing quite successfully for nearly 20 years was soul-destroying.

Also, the training salary of up to pound;13,000 per annum is less than I could live on, besides being a misuse of public money in my case.

In my research to find ways into teaching, I came across teachers who did not have QTS, despite the fact that they had been working as teachers for more than 10 years and were being paid at the top of the main pay scale.

Is there really no way we can use accreditation of prior learning and experience, as we do with students, to ascertain current knowledge and skills? The assessment-only route is not well publicised, and it is not clear who is eligible or what is involved.

Also, how does this square with the Tomlinson report? There has been much talk of students as young as 14 "moving freely between schools, FE colleges and learning providers". Surely, qualified FE teachers, without QTS, are only permitted to teach post-16 students?

It is in no one's interest to lower the standards for entry into teaching - the job is far too demanding to be inflicted on the unprepared. But there needs to be a fairer, and better defined, system of conferring QTS that neither "qualifies" those unsuited, nor forces more training on those who are clearly already "qualified".

Name and address supplied

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now