Narrow reading

15th July 2005 at 01:00
I am surprised and disappointed that the independent review of the teaching of reading to be headed by Jim Rose focuses on synthetic phonics only.

Phonics on its own, whether synthetic or analytic, will not produce fluent readers who understand the text.

The 1975 Bullock report, the most comprehensive inquiry into English teaching to date, concluded "there is no one method, medium, approach, device or philosophy that holds the key to the process of learning to read".

The idea that the review will discover a Holy Grail method of teaching reading, effective with all pupils, regardless of age, ability or disposition, is a fallacy.

The Government has said that it is only interested in what works. I would like to see that reflected in the review.

Hilary Bills


National Union of Teachers, Hamilton House

Mabledon Place, London WC1

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today