New 'floor standard' pits schools against each other

15th February 2013 at 00:00
Fixed quota of secondaries will not hit target under Gove's reforms

A fixed quota of secondary schools will be judged to be below crucial "floor standards" and eligible for closure or other intervention, regardless of how high overall exam results climb, under a new government proposal.

The idea, contained in a little-noticed section of last week's secondary school accountability consultation, is causing consternation among union leaders, who say it could leave some heads' jobs on the line even if results dramatically improve.

Other measures proposed in the biggest overhaul of secondary league tables since their introduction in 1992 have been broadly welcomed. They include an end to the current benchmark of five A*-C GCSEs including English and maths as the main headline measure, and the introduction of a sampling system as a new national measure of standards.

Schools that do not meet the floor standards are open to a variety of government interventions, which include closing the schools and replacing them with academies, with heads losing their jobs. At the moment, the standards are based on predetermined targets for exam results and pupil progress levels. If the targets are cleared then schools have nothing to fear.

But Department for Education officials are concerned that they will not know in advance where to pitch the targets when revamped GCSEs are first sat in 2017. Instead, they are suggesting that, for one year only, a fixed quota would be set. Schools' actual results would not be a factor in floor standards, just where they were ranked in relation to other schools.

"In this approach we would identify the worst-performing number of schools, rather than those below a predetermined floor standard," the DfE consultation says.

Russell Hobby, general secretary of the NAHT heads' union, said he would oppose the quota idea. "It doesn't actually make the case for if a school is good or bad," he said. "It just makes the case for whether it is a better or worse school. Unless there is some guard, some kind of absolute criteria, then I think people will be very unhappy with that kind of approach.

"Even if you had a group of absolutely outstanding schools, one of them would be worse than all the others, but you wouldn't be justified in shutting that school down on that basis."

The DfE consultation appears to acknowledge this problem with its own proposal, saying: "We do not propose to use relative measures as part of the longer term floor standard arrangements as this would mean each year there would be a set number of schools who fall below the floor standard, with no opportunity to recognise improvements across the system."

One exam board insider told TES they agreed that the first year of new GCSE results would be an unreliable measure of real school performance as some schools would adapt more quickly to the new qualifications than others. But they suggested that instead of quotas, the government should just suspend the floor targets for a year.

After a year of the new GCSEs, ministers intend to base floor standards on two new measures (see panel, left). They are also proposing a new system of national sample tests in English, maths and science. They would be similar to the international Pisa, Pirls and Timss tests but would take place annually.

The aim is to place less strain on the design of the GCSE, the qualification currently used to track national standards. The move to national sampling would, the government believes, also remove any incentive for politicians to try to demonstrate that their policies were working by allowing GCSE standards to slip.

Malcolm Trobe, deputy general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, described national sampling as "a good idea".

The end of the five A*-C GCSEs including English and maths benchmark as the main measure of performance is aimed at ending schools' "excessive focus" on pupils on the C-D grade borderline. The points score measure that replaces it will give schools an incentive to improve results at all grades. A government consultation on primary school accountability will follow.

Read more about the reforms online at bit.lyVIaNKS

New targets

The current benchmark of five A*-C GCSEs including English and maths will be replaced as the main headline measure and basis for school "floor standards". Floor standards will be calculated on two new measures.

The first will look at the proportion of pupils in each school who achieve a C or equivalent in their English and maths GCSEs. The second will be based on a points score indicator, set according to pupils' achievements in eight qualifications, with credits given for every grade.

English and maths GCSEs will be compulsory in the measure, alongside any three of the other English Baccalaureate GCSEs: languages, computer science, history, geography and sciences. The three remaining "slots" could be filled by further EBac GCSEs "or any other high value arts, academic or (government-approved) vocational qualifications".

School floor standards will look at how much value has been added when pupils' achievements on the points score measure are compared to their primary test results.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today