New perspectives on old masters

19th May 2006 at 01:00
How did Vermeer and other painters achieve the photographic qualities that distinguish their works? Chris Holt finds plenty to study here that links science and art

Is it possible that, for the past 600 years, famous artists have been secretly using mirrors and lenses to help them to paint realistic pictures? That is the belief of David Hockney and others, who claim they can see artefacts in the paintings which are the result of optical projection. The Hockney proposition is contentious, but gives an excellent opportunity for a meeting of science and art in the classroom right across the age range.

In the case of one artist, Johannes Vermeer, there is general agreement that he did, indeed, use optical tools in his painting.

For many years people have been puzzled by the photograph-like quality of his paintings. In the background of many of his works are wall maps and paintings by other artists which are reproduced in minute detail. The clincher, though, is that many of his paintings contain features which appear to be out of focus.

A plausible explanation is that he was copying an image that had been produced by a lens.

Phillip Steadman has made an exhaustive study of the works of Vermeer. He believes that the Dutch master used a camera obscura to help him in his work. This consists of a darkened room, or chamber, with a lens inserted in one wall so that an image of the view outside is projected on to the opposite wall within the chamber. The artist then traces or paints over the projected image to give a picture of photographic quality.

David Hockney has taken the idea further, and suggests that many artists from the 15th century onwards have been using optical methods in their work. During the 15th century, there was a huge transformation in the appearance of art, from flat unrealistic images, to modern photograph-like images. Hockney believes this was because of the discovery and use of optics by artists.

He says the evidence is in the paintings. Often, objects on a table at different distances from the observer appear unnaturally tilted relative to the surface they are on, and some patterned tablecloths appear strangely distorted.

The vanishing point is the term used in perspective to describe the point where parallel lines in a picture appear to meet. The objects in a painting should all have the same one. However, paintings often contain several rectangular objects, such as books, which have different vanishing points.

Some patterned tablecloths display different vanishing points at the front and back of the pattern. These problems would arise if optical systems were being used.

Lenses have a limited depth-of-focus, therefore the artist would have to refocus in order to paint the near and far parts of the scene. However, refocusing changes the magnification, which would lead to distortion of the overall image. This is possibly the reason for the unnatural appearance of many paintings.

Chris Holt is a freelance science writer

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now