'No hiding place' for those who fail to reach targets

11th July 1997 at 01:00
There will be "no hiding place for under-performing schools", teachers were told at the launch on Monday of the White Paper. Nor for those content merely to "coast along".

For the first time from September 1998, individual schools must set their own targets for improvement, based on information about similar schools and recent inspection evidence.

There is a dramatically enhanced role for education authorities, which will help schools meet the targets and identify problems, sending in specialist advisers to nip them in the bud. As part of this early-warning system, LEAs will demand action plans. If these are inadequate, the LEA could appoint extra governors, take back control of schools' budgets, or ask the Office for Standards in Education to inspect a school ahead of schedule.

As a last resort, a hopeless school would be closed or given a "fresh start". Under the second option it would be taken over by another, successful school, or reopened under new management and a new name. There will also be new legal powers allowing the Government to intervene directly and force an authority to close a failing school. Regular inspections of authorities will begin next January.

Authorities will also have to produce three-year education plans for approval by the Secretary of State. Where an authority is deemed to be failing to improve fast enough, the Secretary of State can order an emergency inspection and, if necessary, order a "hit squad" to take over its functions.

The Department for Education and Employment, in partnership with the new standards and effectiveness unit, will itself take a more active role in levering up standards. "It will no longer be sufficient to act at a distance, " says the White Paper. The task force on standards, headed by chief inspector Chris Woodhead and Birmingham chief education officer, Tim Brighouse, will be "carrying the crusade to every part of the education service."

The White Paper underscores the value of OFSTED, but also proposes changes. The frequency of inspection (currently once every six years) will remain the same, but the period of notice of an inspection will be reduced from five terms to two, and the inspectors should focus more closely on classroom practice.

OFSTED will also be expected to make inspection data and school comparisons more widely available and to introduce an appeals mechanism. Inspectors will have to meet parents as well as staff after each inspection.

The White Paper says that the procedures for getting rid of bad teachers are too bureaucratic and lengthy, but offers no detailed alternatives. Instead it asks the unions and governor organisations to "develop streamlined model procedures and recommend them for adoption locally". Headteachers may also be required to report concerns about poor teachers to governors.

Josephine Gardiner

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now