No official instructions

17th September 2004 at 01:00
Although I agree with much in Annette Zera's article (FE Focus, TES, September 3), I do want to correct what she says about the workings of the Moser Committee. I was the specialist adviser to thecommittee responsible for the minutes of meetings, and was the only person present at every meeting.

Although the need to reform existing qualifications in literacy and numeracy for adults - of which there were 60 - was discussed frequently, it did not dominate. If it had, few other recommendations would have been produced. Furthermore, we were never told by ministers or officials that "the minister insisted that a national system of testing should be introduced". In fact, they gave few, if any, instructions.

Alan Wells Director, The Basic Skills Agency Commonwealth House 1-19 New Oxford Street London WC1

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now