Only as free as they're allowed to be

30th April 2010 at 01:00

Why all the fuss about parent-run schools? ("Free schools: a better education for all, or a panacea for pushy parents?", April 23) If any government wants to allow a self-selected group of parents to run a school funded wholly by taxpayers, it could do so at a flick of the legislative wrist.

Just a line or two of legislation would permit a form of school where the local authority is excluded and parents form a majority on the governing body. That self-perpetuating parental majority could then appoint the head and enjoy such "freedoms" from the statutory requirements imposed on other schools as the schools secretary of the day chose to give them.

Presumably, like academies, these schools would be wholly funded by, dependent on and accountable to the schools secretary. If anything upsets the governors, the parents not on the governing body, or the community the school serves, there is always a right of appeal. To whom? To the schools secretary, of course. "Free" schools are government schools, though some of their proponents seem not to have understood this yet.

Sir Peter Newsam, Former chief schools adjudicator, Thornton-le-Dale, North Yorkshire.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today