The option that must remain wide open

12th April 1996 at 01:00
Business education has been a continuing success story. The number of pupils following business studies GCSEs has increased year on year since 1986, and the proportion is now some 20 per cent of the pupil cohort. This is quite an achievement for what is regarded as an option subject especially after the pressure of the national curriculum.

GNVQ business courses have shown a similar pattern. They have established a strong lead over other GNVQ courses. In universities and colleges of higher education, business education courses among the most popular with students. Why? Two elements are common in all the successful courses: relevance and validity. Pupils see business education as relevant to the world around.

However, validity is present only where there is a wide range of learning and assessment modes. Courses that have been designed for the wider audience attract large numbers while traditional narrowly-based courses attract few.

In his review of 16-19 qualifications (or, more accurately, 14-19), Sir Ron Dearing has accepted the popularity of both the GCSE and GNVQ courses, allowing both to continue in parallel pathways.

In an attempt to improve the skills required in the workplace, the report also seeks to develop a key skills in communication, the application of number, information technology and interpersonal skills. Business studies teachers will be familiar with these, especially those who used the Business and Information Studies Courses.

The current pattern of GCSE business studies courses has had several years to establish standards and credibility. The GNVQ courses, however, have had a difficult start. They have been strongly criticised in a recent report by OFSTED and Sir Ron accepts there are problems. Most stem from a loose assessment structure and over-complex administration.

GNVQs have provided a wide range of learning and assessment modes. But it appears Sir Ron intends to restrict the range of assessment and, it is hoped, make these courses "more rigorous". This probably means more content-based assessment as the report recommends an element of external assessment. Such a move will automatically reduce their appeal.

Similarly in GCSE, the broad approach, started in 1986, of "Know, Understand and Can Do", has seen changes in assessment regimes to increased focus on knowledge to the exclusion of others.

If we are to include most 14-19 pupils in the education process, courses must be broadened both in the ranges of learning modesstyles and of assessment modes.This will mean more complex assessment, difficult for the officers of School Curriculum and Assessment Authority and the exam boards to administer and possibly more costly, but there is no alternative.

Ben Kelsey Ben Kelsey is chief executive of the National Design and Technology Education Foundation

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today