Oxbridge admissions tutors back the bac

17th October 2003 at 01:00
Warwick Mansell Admissions tutors at Oxford and Cambridge universities favour plans for a baccalaureate-style diploma to replace A-levels and GCSEs, The TES can reveal.

Some Oxbridge dons believe it could give able students a better grounding in academic subjects than traditional A-levels.

Last week independent school heads rejected changes proposed by a government taskforce.

Mike Tomlinson, the taskforce's chairman, presented the proposals to admissions tutors from Cambridge university this month.

One of the diploma's aims is to improve the breadth of young people's education, although critics believe it would reduce the depth of study in individual subjects.

Mr Tomlinson denied this. He said: "I am in the business of dumbing up, not dumbing down."

He said students would be able to pursue supplementary courses to give depth to traditional A-level-style study. For example, a sixth- former studying history might take a language course to help them read foreign documents.

The taskforce's plans were presented in outline form in the summer. Full details will not be finalised until next July.

However, Dr Geoff Parks, director of admissions for Cambridge, said: "We had a very constructive meeting with Mr Tomlinson. We are very encouraged by his ideas."

Dr Richard Barnes, admissions tutor at Emmanuel College, said: "We like many of his ideas."

Tutors welcomed the proposal for supplementary subjects. They said it could help prevent high-flying sixth-formers trying to accumulate high grades in many A-levels, instead of studying three subjects in depth.

The Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, in its official submission, highlighted potential problems for Mr Tomlinson's group. It said that the complex infrastructure of schools, colleges and training providers had not been designed to support a single learning phase for 14 to 19-year-olds, one of the aims of the report.

And the taskforce's suggestion of cutting the number of exams and placing more emphasis on teacher assessment would not necessarily be welcomed by teachers, said the submission.

Another Voice 26

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now