Pedagogic clones

4th July 2008 at 01:00
I share the concerns of Professor Paul Black (King's College London) and Bill Boyle (Manchester University), that the Government's version of assessment for learning (AfL) is "just a camouflage for accountability purposes"

I share the concerns of Professor Paul Black (King's College London) and Bill Boyle (Manchester University), that the Government's version of assessment for learning (AfL) is "just a camouflage for accountability purposes". But I would go further. Although AfL is not of itself a bad thing, it has shifted the balance dangerously away from flamboyant and inspirational teaching performance towards the dreary assessment of pupil learning and the burgeoning collection of data that goes with it. This has spawned a generation of lacklustre pedagogic clones who sing from the same boring and bureaucratic songsheet.

Stan Labovitch, secondary teacher, Windsor.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now