Penis fixation misses the point

18th September 2009 at 01:00

It's interesting that girls have consistently outperformed boys in English from the start of universal public education ("Gender gap going strong in 1900", September 11).

There are anomalies. For instance, boys outperformed girls in "composition" in 1900 - boys scoring 91 per cent and girls 76 per cent. But by 1923, girls were outperforming boys in composition by 24 per cent.

What happened in those 23 years and subsequently? As the biology of gender is more or less constant, the answer must be social. We are given a clue in the societal effects of the First World War. Anther, albeit unconscious, is the snide reference by the writer to high-performing boys being "tubercular 13-year-olds called Herbert".

I'm fed up with half digested socio-biology "theory" about boys' brains. They can't have altered much over the last few hundred years. And, to my knowledge, Shakespeare, Dickens, Orwell and Ian McEwan all had, or have, penises and all were, or are, pretty ace at "composition".

What's important is what a culture is telling boys and girls about who they can be and what we, as teachers, are doing to challenge and critique assumptions and stereotyping.

  • Graham Jamesonm London.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today