Phonics awareness battle was won

9th May 1997 at 01:00
That hearing-impaired children "often" lag behind their hearing peers as C Sanderson suggests (TES, April 25), does not, it seems to me, support the idea that the teaching of phonics is essential to the reading process.

If hearing-impaired children eventually, at some stage, gain parity with their hearing peers then the teaching of phonics is not crucial but smooths the path to a more or less degree. Its non-inclusion does not have to mean total or even partial failure, only an extension in the time taken to achieve competency (maybe).

In recognition of this, the battle to include phonics awareness as part of the armoury the beginning reader takes with herhim into the reading struggle was won long ago but it would seem this is not enough for some.

JOHN GRIFFITHS 12 Kempton Avenue Northolt, Middlesex

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now