Phonics awareness battle was won

9th May 1997 at 01:00
That hearing-impaired children "often" lag behind their hearing peers as C Sanderson suggests (TES, April 25), does not, it seems to me, support the idea that the teaching of phonics is essential to the reading process.

If hearing-impaired children eventually, at some stage, gain parity with their hearing peers then the teaching of phonics is not crucial but smooths the path to a more or less degree. Its non-inclusion does not have to mean total or even partial failure, only an extension in the time taken to achieve competency (maybe).

In recognition of this, the battle to include phonics awareness as part of the armoury the beginning reader takes with herhim into the reading struggle was won long ago but it would seem this is not enough for some.

JOHN GRIFFITHS 12 Kempton Avenue Northolt, Middlesex

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today