Phonics row escalates over charge of bias

10th June 2011 at 01:00

Surely Ruth Miskin is being disingenuous when suggesting there can be no link between the content of the revised national curriculum and the content of her phonic teaching schemes. The work she has done on her commercial material cannot fail to influence, for better or worse, the advice she offers.

Equally, her participation in the review would give her a flying start at revising her materials compared with her commercial rivals. In both these respects, her position would be compromised. As the National Association for the Teaching of English argues, she should resign and continue her all too successful lobbying from the sidelines.

Professor Colin Richards, Spark Bridge, Cumbria.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now