Pilloried enough without GTC

10th January 2003 at 00:00
I WAS under the impression that the General Teaching Council was introduced to "raise the profile of teaching".

I find it difficult to accept the weekly articles that describe cases being brought before the council. When a doctor or a lawyer is brought before their "councils" for disciplinary reasons it is usually for something much more serious than a teacher who was apparently rolling her eyes and fidgeting during an interview with parents (TES, December 13).

Our profession is constantly being pilloried; low pay and poor working conditions sap morale, poor pupil behaviour is discouraging people from either staying or even joining and huge pressure from government all add to our "woe". So why does The TES include such articles?

The last thing any of us want is to read about disciplinary matters at the GTC.

David Jones

55 Station Road Low Ackworth

Pontefract, West Yorkshire

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers

Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today