On the politics of setting

12th April 2013 at 01:00

I was disappointed that the debate on ability-group teaching (5 April) did not discuss why successive governments have supported teaching in ability groups.

A member of the present government has pointed out that only one vote in 60 affects the outcome of a general election - and this one in 60 voters tends to be middle class, middle ground. This means that governments make the political judgement that the "parents who matter" are the sort that don't want to see their middle-class child in the same group as some low-ability, working-class child who might, after all, have some behaviour problem. The clear solution in this case is for these low-ability students to be separated out - meaning that their education is considered as being less important than political success.

So despite past research that tends to suggest that mixed-ability grouping is generally more successful than grouping by ability, we are given the impression that setting beats all. Also, since the national curriculum expects teaching in ability groups, it is easy for inspectors to criticise schools teaching mixed ability because they are not conforming to government policy.

Mike Rath, Exeter.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today