'Poor quality' of CPD revisited

2nd November 2012 at 00:00

In your report on the Holyrood conference last week ("Downside of teachers' learning communities", 26 October) there were unfortunate omissions in the statement, attributed to me, that I had told the conference that CPD programmes were "notoriously poor in quality".

My remarks were prompted by Glenn Rodger's assertion that in Scotland "we do not share good practice", which I challenged. What was actually said was that because some CPD in schools had been perceived to be poor in quality, teachers had organised themselves through social media to share best practice, and that such sharing was of high quality in terms of its effect on the classroom experiences of learners through improved use of technologies, outdoor learning, Assessment is for Learning and pedagogy, for example.

Nick Hood, Rosyth.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now