'Poor quality' of CPD revisited

2nd November 2012 at 00:00

In your report on the Holyrood conference last week ("Downside of teachers' learning communities", 26 October) there were unfortunate omissions in the statement, attributed to me, that I had told the conference that CPD programmes were "notoriously poor in quality".

My remarks were prompted by Glenn Rodger's assertion that in Scotland "we do not share good practice", which I challenged. What was actually said was that because some CPD in schools had been perceived to be poor in quality, teachers had organised themselves through social media to share best practice, and that such sharing was of high quality in terms of its effect on the classroom experiences of learners through improved use of technologies, outdoor learning, Assessment is for Learning and pedagogy, for example.

Nick Hood, Rosyth.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today