Pounds 22m 'wasted' in Government special needs failure

3rd May 1996 at 01:00
A former Tory party chairman in Scotland has accused the Government of wasting vast sums of public money by failing to have an effective strategy for people with special needs north of the border.

Bill Hughes, president of Work Wise - an organisation which has provided special needs training for more than 10 years - said: "Recent research findings suggest that existing special needs provision is not meeting the needs of either employers or the client group."

His organisation estimates that Pounds 22 million may have been wasted. "I am convinced that we have to alter our perspectives in terms of how we design and fund special needs training," he added.

Sir Donald Mackay, chairman of the jobs and training arm Scottish Enterprise, defended the organisation's commitment to special needs training. But, he admitted, "more effective targeting is needed to suit employers in particular".

Senior Work Wise staff claimed at a Glasgow conference last week that Scottish Enterprise's record was so unsatisfactory that it should cease to have sole responsibility for special needs training.

Work Wise chairman Roland Herman-Smith said: "If we don't get it right, then frankly we're wasting an awful lot of money."

Complaints were made at the conference that vocational qualifications got payment by results which prejudiced the chances of trainees with learning difficulties and disabilities.

Mr Hughes' comments were particularly embarrassing for ministers as he is credited with being the architect of the Scottish training and enterprise network.

The Work Wise philosophy is that special needs training, which covers 17 per cent of all those eligible for Government-funded training in Scotland, should focus more sharply on improving social skills and trainees' attitudes.

Caroline Farquhar, chief executive of Work Wise, urged Scottish Enterprise to emphasise personal development to help trainees become employable.

The research also highlighted wide variations in the definitions of special needs among the 13 local enterprise companies (equivalent to training and enterprise councils) which control training funds in central Scotland (the Highland network was not included in the study).

Few took account of ex-offenders or people with English as a second language. Glasgow is the only LEC which considers people with accommodation problems.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now