Preposterous early-years targets

20th November 1998 at 00:00
In "formality damages under fives" (TES, November 6) your report quoting comments I made at the recent Liberal Democrat conference on education did not make clear that I used the word "preposterous" in the context of possible targets for two and three-year-olds.

My suggestion was that it would be helpful if we considered first what the entitlements of young children should be in our society.

In my judgment, this is preferable to an emphasis on outcomes, which demonstrably leads to potentially damaging rigidity of practice where practitioners and policy-makers do not understand the way that children learn best in the early years.

Wendy Scott

Chief executive The British Association for Early Childhood Education 111 City View House 463 Bethnal Green Road London E2

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today