Primary confused by conflicting GM messages

3rd November 1995 at 00:00
Further to your report on the grant-maintained status ballot at Enmore School (TES, October 13), I should like to point out that Somerset did not dispute the ballot process in the two-month period when official objections were raised (April-May). Nor did the LEA subsequently make any objections during the following four months (June-September).

During that time, however, it did: * negotiate with the school re buying back services when GM; * remove our listing as an LEA school in BT telephone directory in June; * require the removal of shared equipment from our school in July; * omit our school from the primary adviser listin July (every other LEA primary was included); * write to staff terminating their employment in September.

The LEA's action in seeking leave to apply for judicial review on the evening of Friday September 29 runs counter to all the above.

E C MEIKLEJOHN Headteacher Enmore C of E GM Primary School Enmore, near Bridgwater, Somerset

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today