Primary scores 'a shaky foundation'

23rd December 2005 at 00:00
Any kind of performance measuring in primaries has "a very shaky foundation", say two prominent researchers on assessment.

Linda Croxford of Edinburgh University and Mike Cowie of Aberdeen University argue in a forthcoming paper that data on 5-14 levels can sometimes "give a spurious impression of precision and objectivity". Tests in primary and early secondary have no reliability compared with National Qualifications and it is unfair to hold schools accountable for them. The vast majority of councils still use 5-14 tests for monitoring and accountability, they state.

Uncertainty around national tests has forced local authorities and schools to bring in other primary tests (such as Performance Indicators in Primary Tests, or PIPS) but even these may "lack validity if they are not relevant to the curriculum being used".

A further factor, the researchers say, is that introducing new forms of testing for purposes of monitoring is contrary to the conclusions of the national debate on education that parents and teachers want less assessment, especially in primary.

They point out that the Scottish Executive is moving towards formative assessment which does not provide appropriate measures for performance monitoring.

Dr Croxford told The TES Scotland that there is "such incredibly rigorous monitoring now" because the Standards in Scottish Schools Act 2000 requires local authorities to vouch for local standards. There was "tough, intelligent accountability" in the system already without having to resort to league tables of performance.

She believes that the best way to achieve higher standards is for individual schools and local authorities to share information in confidence. "The decision by Peter Peacock to stop the publication of league tables was the best thing they have done," Dr Croxford said.

Accounting for School Performance in Scottish Local Authorities. By Linda Croxford and Mike Cowie. Published in the Briefing series by the Centre for Educational Sociology at Edinburgh University.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today