Private pay and public interest

1st September 2000 at 01:00
YOUR article (FE Focus, August 25) on the Association of Colleges' survey of middle managers' and senior postholders' salaries in further education claimed that: "The AOC, which wished to make the survey results confidential, declined to comment on the findings." This is incorrect.

As I state in the foreword to the survey: "There has been a general increase in the level of public interest in pay and benefits matters - not only in education but in other professions.

"The association's policy is openness where this is proper.

"For this reason, and as some of the data reaching the public has been incorrect and the cnclusions drawn often misleading, I am concerned to ensure that if we find pay issues for the sector are broadcast, that the information is accurate.

"As a result, where necessary, we may provide a resume of the main points from the survey to show a rational level of openness."

We do remain concerned about protecting the confidentiality of individual postholders.

It is not the AOC's policy to comment on documents obtained without the association's authorisation.

David Gibson

Chief executive

Association of Colleges

Fifth floor, Centre Point

103 New Oxford Street

London WC1A

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today