Privilege still rules at Oxford

30th June 2006 at 01:00
It was interesting to read Coralie Young (Friday magazine, June 16) on "the work of dozens of people... who are trying to prove" that Oxford does not discriminate against state schools and that there is no reason why "a bright and determined teenager... can't break down the imagined barriers".

Unfortunately, the figures tell a different story.

In 2005, Oxford accepted 1,290 pupils (46.7 per cent) from private schools, which cater for 8 per cent of the school population. They also offered 279 places (10.1 per cent) to pupils from the remaining 164 grammar schools, but only 809 (29.3 per cent) to the 3,321 "other maintained schools", presumably "comprehensives".

Cambridge was only marginally better; even worse, the figures I have show little change over the last three years.

Even if you include the grammar schools as state schools, the proportion is still, at 39.4 per cent, far less than that of the private sector. These figures reveal a grotesque imbalance which will take more than the efforts of a few well-meaning individuals to rectify.

Tony Mitchell Vice-chair, Socialist Educational Association 51 Falcon Avenue Bedford

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today