Profit at a cost

25th September 2009 at 01:00

I'm not surprised that Neil Reed ("Teaching is only half the story", August 14), an associate director of a private consultancy that advises FE colleges on finance and management, considers finance and management to be so important. Nor am I surprised that his thinking is imbued with the management speak of teams "delivering" learning. Learning, unlike the morning post and pizzas, cannot be delivered, as it is not a product but a process.

I am, however, surprised by the slack assumptions in his letter. I don't think that what's wrong with FE boils down to a lack of focus on teaching and learning, nor have I ever suggested that senior management should have a "significant" teaching load.

My argument is that education - and not "the delivery of management and learning" - is, or should be, the main focus of FE colleges. And that a financially well-run college is a necessary, but not a sufficient, condition for success. Unlike private consultancies, whose prime purpose is profit, the raison d'etre of FE colleges is further education.

Frank Coffield, Emeritus professor of education, Institute of Education, London University.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today