Question marks over sex education

12th April 1996 at 01:00
Provision for sex education is inadequate, a conference held during the Edinburgh Science Festival has been told. Joan Forrest, of the faculty of education at Strathclyde University, said that failings were despite "a willingness among teachers to address issues and develop skills and knowledge in order that they can work more effectively with their pupils".

Ms Forrest, author of Personal Relationships and Developing Sexuality, published by the Scottish Office and distributed to schools, added: "Rarely has an area of the curriculum concerned staff, pupils and parents so much."

But she warned that official guidance on sex education and accompanying support materials were just "a starting point" for staff development. Schools had to be sensitive "to the needs of individual staff members". Many remained embarrassed and concerned about being drawn into talking about their own experiences.

The conference, organised by the Medical Research Council, aimed to encourage a sharing of knowledge on teenage sexual behaviour and of ways to tackle sex education.

Ms Forrest made a plea that this should "not simply be a case of equipping young people with skills and knowledge", but should be about producing "learning opportunities" relevant to the needs of particular groups of children.

Dr Daniel Wight, of the research council's medical sociology unit in Glasgow, said the "current orthodoxy of health education" allowed young people to set the agenda and learn to make responsible decisions. A skills-based, or behaviourist approach, however, is advocated by social psychologists.

Tensions inherent in the two approaches are being studied under Sexual Health and Relationships, a research programme on sex education for 13 to 15-year-olds. The programme, funded by the Health Education Board for Scotland, began in 1994 and has four more years to go.

One interim finding is that pupils between the ages of 13 and 15 are shy of talking about sex. Dr Wight said that classroom discussions had been marked by "long silences" partly because "pupils wish to avoid discussions on details of their own relationships" but mainly because of their inexperience.

He added: "Yet our programmes have been criticised by some health promotion officers for having too old a target group."

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today