Quote us, not third-party evidence

18th March 2011 at 00:00

In last week's edition (11 March), unfortunately, you misrepresented Ofqual's position on international comparisons, wrongly reporting us as saying that rankings from the Pisa survey are "not that meaningful".

You suggest this, it seems, because our methodology and progress report on international comparisons in senior secondary assessment makes reference to this view from a third-party study from King's College London.

It is our job to obtain and evaluate all available evidence before coming to any conclusions. To take selective quotes from a statement of methodology and present it as Ofqual's position misrepresents the facts.

We share with the DfE a commitment to a thorough understanding of how our qualifications compare with others across the world. Ofqual's progress report shows how we intend to secure that understanding, and in doing so discusses some of the challenges we face in comparing assessments used in different countries.

Sandra Burslem, Deputy chair, Ofqual.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today