4th February 2005 at 00:00
Followers of peaceable religions differ in their attitudes towards eating or hunting animals. Hunting existed in biblical times but seems not to have been widespread in ancient Israel and then not as sport. Strong views pro and anti-hunting may mean no real exchange of ideas and therefore little real learning in class. Showers of parental letters may also fall if teacher bias is suspected! Reverse-empathy exercises (making children argue the case for the side they don't agree with) can help. Interview a rural figure such as a member of the clergy or a pub landlord and ask how they cope with deeply divided parishionerscustomers. RE has a legitimate interest in reasons for hunting, methods used, the pain the animal suffers (or doesn't), possible alternatives -and how far the answers to these can be accommodated to particular beliefs about God and "animals".

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today