Re the review

1st December 1995 at 00:00
May I, as Sarah's Dad, write in support of the excellent and timely advice which John Dunford is offering to Sir Ron Dearing (TES, November 24), but may I add two caveats?

First, "greater emphasis on a modular approach" may be a sensible proposal, but we urgently need some independent research on the student experience of modules before the whole education system from 14 to 25 (or 65) goes modular.

Second, "core skills should be made compulsory for all post 16 students".

But if Sir Ron Dearing's reforms of the national curriculum were truly to be implemented by schools, there would be no need for core skills. Why do we need to teach 16 to 19-year-olds to communicate in their mother tongue, to count and to talk a foreign language?

Shouldn't they be competent in all these areas as a result of studying the national curriculum from 5 to 16?

PROFESSOR FRANK COFFIELD School of Education University of Durham

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today