Remuneration trepidation

5th October 2012 at 01:00

I note last week's editorial ("Whisper it, but performance pay might be good news", 28 September) with interest. The current trajectory of government policy is to give heads and governing bodies greater control over the salaries budget and this will in due course be accompanied by tighter funding levels. The story is drearily familiar to those with experience of FE after incorporation in the early 1990s, where local pay determination has resulted in very significant drops in the average level of remuneration, even if some staff are highly rewarded.

The implication for schools, where salaries are the largest part of the budget, will be that average remuneration falls, disguised by individualised performance pay - or running harder to stand still. The last government tried to redress the pay issue for school teachers (but not FE) by creating a proper career structure. Clearly the numbers of teachers who deserted Labour at the last election might suggest they did not get it right, but the principle is clearly better than a reward system based on nebulous and possibly inequitable performance appraisal.

Dr John Hurley, Learning Partners.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today