Research and good practice close gaps

16th January 2004 at 00:00
There is something fundamentally wrong in education, says Louise Hayward of Glasgow University's faculty of education. Good practice abounds, research has uncovered a wealth of ways of improving learning and new policies are devised almost daily, yet school still fails large numbers of children.

"Why has there been so much innovation in education and so little change? So much activity yet so little to show for it?"

The answer, she believes, relates to the ways the various education communities work together, or rather don't. "The researchers, the policy-makers and the practitioners all tend to do their own things.

"The model we've lived with for a long time is that policy may or may not be based on research but once policy is developed the practitioners are simply told what to do. Then it's their job to get on with it."

The reason this fails is that it ignores what teachers have learned from their education, experience and professional reflection. So East Ayrshire's two-year pilot project Closing the Gap has been gently guided in a different direction by Ms Hayward and her colleague Nicki Hedge.

The idea that researchers would go into Primary 1 classrooms to observe and analyse and then tell teachers the mistakes they were making was rejected from the start.

"There is a perception among teachers that their professional judgment of the children they work with has lost importance," says Dr Hedge. "So we intentionally did not go in to observe or interview.

"The first time we went into their classrooms was just a few weeks ago, and then it wasn't to check up on them but because they invited us.

"Every school and classroom is different, so researchers can't tell practitioners what to do."

This is not just a matter of treating practitioners with the respect they deserve. It is also recognition that research evidence, while suggestive, has limitations.

"Practice communities have their own deep understandings of the classroom and learning and teaching," says Ms Hayward. "Researchers have other information about how children learn and about aspects of the curriculum.

It is only by bringing these two together that you can deliver real change and give children better life chances."

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today