Research corner

29th May 2015 at 01:00

Each week, we highlight education research conducted by teachers. This week, Catherine Perkins, head of chemistry at Deyes High School in Liverpool, explains how she explored the way students were affected by working in groups of similar and mixed abilities.


Catherine Perkins wanted to examine whether the most able students in her class worked better in groups of mixed or similar ability. She observed them over the course of 20 lessons in different scenarios and tracked their progress.


Perkins wanted to ensure that she was running practical sessions that maximised students' learning potential.


Perkins selected the top eight learners and assigned them a letter from A to H. Student A was identified as the most able, with a target grade of 6a and a prior attainment level of 6c. The remaining high-ability students in the study had targets of 6a or 6b, and the rest of the class had targets of 5a to 6a.

The first scenario consisted of similar-ability group work, with students placed together based on their initial target levels. At the end of this, Perkins analysed the results.

She then implemented the mixed phase, in which high-ability students acted as the leaders of groups. At the end of the unit, Perkins analysed her students' results again and compared them with the previous scores.

The results

In the first unit, Perkins noticed that her class was more competitive. The selected students thrived, along with the others. In a lesson on filters and light, for example, a group of middle-ability students produced level 7 work.

During the mixed-group unit, the learners who were most vocal (rather than most able) became leaders - and Perkins says that fewer students met the criteria for level 7 as a result.

Overall, high-ability students exceeded their targets when working in groups with similarly able classmates. Student A achieved a 5a in the end-of-unit test after mixed ability grouping but a 6b working with similarly able pupils.

This trend also applied to other highly able students (B to H). Although Student B improved slightly in the mixed-ability group, they improved even further in the similar ability setting - advancing from a 6b to a 7c overall. Student H went from a 6c in the mixed group to a 7c in a similar group, and the most improved class member - Student F - progressed from a 5b to a 6a.

The impact

Perkins says she now has a clearer idea about how to form effective working groups. She hopes to undertake more research across other year groups.

For more information, contact Catherine Perkins at

To share your research findings, email

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today