S grade jargon under fire

10th May 1996 at 01:00
An appeal to simplify Standard grade by abandoning the reporting of its separate elements was heavily defeated.

Ian Goldsack, Highland, who proposed the motion, said: "We know the performance of our pupils. What is difficult for the people who are shown the final certificate is, what do these elements mean?" The public were confused by elements such as knowledge and understanding, reasoning, problem-solving and practical skills.

Norman Anderson, Dumfries and Galloway, headteacher of Wallace Hall Academy, incurred the wrath of delegates after proposing that assessment should be wholly internal, with sample moderation, and teachers paid to mark their own Standard grade papers. "How many would agree that the results are almost the same as those sent to the Scottish Examination Board?" Mr Anderson challenged.

Bob McGarill, Glasgow, condemned Mr Goldsack's motion as a "fundamental" attack on Standard grade. Courses would be changed entirely and pupil motivation would suffer. Sheena Richardson, Edinburgh, said: "The idea of trying to differentiate and look at different aspects of every subject has a lot to be said for it."

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today