Satisfactory nap

20th February 2009 at 00:00

To continue the tone of Mike Kent's great back page articles regarding Ofsted, I would add that during my "best" interactive, all-singingdancing maths lesson the inspector actually nodded off for a short time. The blame apparently lay at the door of long nights having meetings and writing reports. The pupils managed to do well despite the man with his eyes closed in the corner.

More seriously though, the whole area of lesson observation is a joke. Different inspectors will see and grade the same lesson differently. The results of lesson observation are unreliable, inconsistent, invalid, and unfair.

Let Ofsted and other inspection bodies look at books and talk to pupils, parents, teachers and management. Let's stop this stupid and damaging extrapolation from 30 minutes of lottery lesson observation.

Will Barber, Woodchester, Stroud, Gloucestershire.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now