Science figures go beyond compare

12th May 2000 at 01:00
YOUR comments about the alleged drop in science standards at key stage 3 (TES, April 28) would not score well, based on forming meaningful conclusions from reliable evidence.

Presumably all that has been compared is the percentage of pupils achieving certain levels at age 11 and then at 14. No account has been taken of the view that comparisons between levels in science at KS2 and KS3 cannot be made in such a simplistic way.

A glance at the programmes of study, and the relevant national tests, shows that conceptual demand and factual content of KS2 tests are much less than those at KS3. Add the gossly different teaching environment of a Year 6 and a Year 8 class, and it is clear how unreliable are such glib comparisons. Measuring a child's improvement is not as simple as comparing numbers in different types of exam taken under different sets of circumstances.

David Glyn

1, Bridge View


Selby, North Yorkshire

The editor writes: The contrast in science performance at key stage 2 and 3 is not based on different percentages achieving as expected, but the fact that this proportion has risen by a quarter at age 11 since 1996 with no equivalent improvement at 14.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today