See 'outstanding' and 'failing' in a new light

30th March 2012 at 01:00

I've just read Anthony Seldon's article ("Why can't we be one big happy family?", 16 March). I was reminded of a TV programme in which John Humphrys visited Wellington College. At one point, Humphrys said: "You have the best teachers." What he should have said was: "You have the easiest students to teach."

I would love to see a "failing" teacher in a difficult comprehensive exchanging with an "outstanding" private school teacher. The latter would struggle with control while the comprehensive teacher would soon realise it was not going to be a problem. Who would then be "outstanding", and who "failing"?

Private school staff like Seldon have no idea what it's like to work in a comprehensive. He can create as many academies as he wants, but they'll never truly reflect the comprehensive system.

Mike Rath, Barnstaple, Devon.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now