Selection charge is unjust

24th February 2006 at 00:00
Your front page headline "Nearly half of academies select their students", TES, February 10 )was misleading and unfair.

The research you reported merely demonstrated that 12 of the 27 open academies make provision to admit up to 10 per cent of their students on the basis of aptitude in their specialism, not on the basis of academic achievement.

The most common curriculum area for this is sport, which accounts for five of the 12. This hardly merits a headline which implies widespread selection on the basis of academic ability.

Moreover, academies which entered pupils for GCSEs in 2005 had an average free school meals eligibility of 39 per cent. This compares with 14 per cent for all schools - hardly evidence of a bias towards the middle classes.

Schools the academies replaced, averaged 21 per cent 5+ A*-C grades at GCSE in their last year; by 2005, the 14 academies which replaced them had improved this to 37 per cent.

Sir Cyril Taylor


Specialist Schools and Academies Trust

37 Queen's Gate

London SW7

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today