Selective queries

16th February 2001 at 00:00
What is the evidence base for the Government's decision to create more specialist secondaries? What has caused it to change from its "standards not structures" philosophy? Why ignore the research which shows that a balanced social mix of pupils contributes to higher achievement across the board?

Perhaps ministers honestly believe that the policy - in pratice, selective - will not produce a lumpen proletariat? Is this some kind of post-modernist permanent revolution? Estelle Morris seems to think so - "schools cannot stay the same, they have to change" she told Radio 4's PM programme. How so, if so many "bog standard" schools are already doing so well?

Professor Margaret Maden Keele University

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today