Settling the score on science

1st February 2013 at 00:00

In response to Alison Wolf's letter ("We know the score with science," 18 January), Science Community Representing Education (Score) fully agrees with the recommendation made in the Wolf report that funding for full-time learners aged 16 to 19 should be on a programme basis, with a core level of funding per learner. This will remove the perverse incentive for providers to "pile up" qualifications rather than develop genuinely full-time programmes that offer clear progression routes. Our concern regarding the removal of subject weighting is a separate issue. We believe that, if implemented, this will have a substantial impact on the science provision on offer at 16-19 institutions. We have published our letter to schools minister David Laws highlighting our full concerns (bit.ly10oqKx4). We are also gathering evidence on the impact this change is likely to have.

Professor Graham Hutchings, Score chair.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today