SHA under attack

11th June 2004 at 01:00
The National College for School Leadership does not find it easy to winkle heads and deputies out of school to do research - traditionally, school leaders do not like spending resources on themselves.

That reluctance may be one reason why the two headteachers' associations, though they run full programmes of courses and consultancies, do not sponsor or fund anything that could properly be called research. The National Association of HeadTeachers recently published a useful pamphlet on "Teaching as a research-informed profession". But the Secondary Heads Association gives the impression of being less interested in research issues and has attracted criticism from Professor Judy Sebba, a former Department for Education and Skills adviser now at Sussex University.

"There's an almost inverse relationship between the power of teacher organisations and interest in research," she told the American Educational Research Association conference in April. "SHA shows the least interest in using or commissioning research and yet it's the most powerful teachers'

organisation in England. Those organisations that are most interested don't carry much weight. One (the NUT) isn't even on speaking terms with the Government."

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today