Shoehorned into courses

25th February 2000 at 00:00
THE article by Doreen Thomson (TESS, February 4) illustrates for me not so much the inadequacies of the Higher Still framework as the result of the pressures under which learning support teachers in secondary schools now have to work.

If she is to continue her involvement at S5 and to build her support for pupils at this level on firm foundations, she needs to be given time and opportunities to develop her skills. She needs the chance to familiarise herself with course documents in all the subjects being offered at her school; to go on in-service courses, not just in English, but in maths, science, social subjects and so on.

I too am concerned that

pupils in her school seem to be being "shoehorned" into courses which are inappropriate for their needs. But is this a result of the Higher Still guidelines or is it the result of sloppy thinking on the part of school management and teaching staff?

For years those of us in learning support have been questioning the validity of Standard grade English at Foundation level for those pupils with very weak literacy skills who have struggled through the course and have toiled, with their teachers, to produce adequate folio pieces to meet the criteria. Much redrafting has been required. Mny students have hated English and English teachers by the end of the course.

It is most unusual, however, for students to gain an award below a 5 and very few students are awarded a 5. Most of those students achieve a 4. I believe that the Higher Still programme offers the chance for a much more honest assessment of what a student can do by eliminating the pretence that a piece of work redrafted many times represents a student's true ability.

In good English courses students study a wide variety of texts and the Higher Still guidelines signal to me that this will continue. If students are having to do one poem and one short story "to death" in order to satisfy performance criteria, then there just might be something wrong.

Perhaps Doreen Thomson would be interested in attending a conference to discuss how the first year of Higher Still has gone for students with learning difficulties at all levels. This is currently being planned for September 6 at the Jordanhill campus of the University of Strathclyde. Details will be in schools shortly.

Isobel Calder

Principal teacher, learning support, Denny High School (seconded to the department of special educational needs, Jordanhill campus)

Letters to the Editor

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today