Should weak teachers face the firing squad?

15th April 2011 at 01:00

Regarding the article "Make firing easier: teachers' verdict on underperformers" (8 April), and the editorial in the same issue, I would like to point out that "underperforming" and "poorly performing" are not the same as "incompetent" or "not capable".

Can any of us say that we have never underperformed? Personal circumstances, illness and so on can distract us or impair our performance, but that is very different to incompetence. Greater "freedom to sack" could lead to hasty decisions, unfair dismissals and the summary end to careers.

Unions are there to ensure that members are dealt with fairly in accordance with agreed procedures. Problem resolution should not be about sackings, but about sensible discussion and negotiation. There are many instances where underperforming teachers are returned to former levels of performance through training and support.

It is crucial that proper processes are put in place to support underperforming teachers, and that each case is judged individually.

Philip Parkin, General secretary, Voice.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?

Subscribe

To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers

Comments

Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
 
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today