Six years later, research is still valid to build on

14th December 2007 at 00:00
The methodology behind Sue Ellis's attempts to discredit the Clackmannanshire research into phonics would make a spin doctor blush (TESS November 30). She bases her critique on a partial sample of five out of eight participating schools, years after the experiment was completed, and under conditions which allowed no control or analysis of intervening factors whatever.

The Clackmannanshire intervention took place during the first 16 weeks of primary education. What happened in the next six years was not in the researchers' control, and I have never seen them or anyone else claim that children completed the task of learning to read in 16 weeks.

The fact that effects, particularly in difficult areas such as the achievement of working-class pupils and boys' spelling, were still significant six years later - educationally as well as statistically - is probably unique in the history of educational research.

Sue Ellis is right to say that the insights gained are only part of the story, but they are a most positive and helpful part. We need to build on them.

John Bald, Symonds Lane, Linton. (Author of 'Using Phonics to Teach Reading and Spelling').

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today