Skewed priorities in Glasgow's bid to cut supply staff

7th May 2010 at 01:00

It would seem that Glasgow City Council, much like other local authorities, is hell-bent on jeopardising frontline services in education by cutting teacher numbers.

First, we have the ludicrous situation of retired teachers being replaced with a succession of probationers year after year, thus reducing the number of permanent teaching posts to practically zero, not to mention the effect this lack of continuity has on our children's education. Now we hear that the local authority has written to secondaries to ask them to cut temporary supply staff in Glasgow schools during the exam diet in May.

A spokeswoman for the council has responded by trotting out the old chestnut that "during the current financial climate, Glasgow, like most other local authorities, must be as efficient as possible".

Can I make a suggestion? Instead of cutting teacher numbers, councils could save money by not paying out huge amounts of compensation in early retirement and redundancy packages to senior staff in the offices.

In 35 years of teaching, I have seen a proliferation in the number of "strategic" posts, with very little positive to show for them.

Jeanette Potter, Corsebar Road, Paisley.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today