Skiving 'worse' under devolved truancy plans

21st January 2000 at 00:00
EDUCATION welfare officers will not be able to challenge schools that turn a blind eye to "difficult" pupils bunking off lessons, under devolution plans.

So says the Local Government Association which, along with the education welfare managers' association, is critical of government proposals to devolve welfare services to secondaries. It would mean officers answered to headteachers, rather than operating independently as authority-run services, it says.

The two organisations say the proposals are ill-thought-out, lack evidence and could lead to a fragmentation of services for truanting children.

Ministers last November proposed transferring responsibility for dealing with absenteeism to secondary schools, following an Audit Commission report which criticised variations in the quality of council-run services.

Just under 400,000 of the eight million pupils in England and Wales are skipping school, according to the commission. Yet it found that nearly a third of local authorities still had not produced guidelines to help schools tackle absences.

Half of education welfare services were not checking up on the effectieness of school procedures - preferring instead to work on a case-by-case basis.

But the LGA accuses the Government of making "selective and misleading" use of the commission's report to justify devolving education welfare to schools.

Evidence from some authorities which have already devolved services suggests that provision has worsened. Nottingham reversed its devolution policy, after a critical report from the Office for Standards in Education.

Jenny Price, general secretary for the Association for Education Welfare Management, said: "There are some children not wanted by schools. Who's going to look after those kids?"

The association warns that devolution would:

Complicate management structures.

Set up unnecessary tensions between education authorities and secondary schools, and secondaries and primaries.

Endanger continuity of service between primary and secondary.

Limit the opportunities for sharing good practice.

Not necessarily safeguard the interests of individual children.

Consultation on proposals closed last month. The Government's final conclusions are due shortly.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now