Sky-high ideals for inspection

26th February 2010 at 00:00

The problems of the Ofsted process and the lack of credibility of inspectors has long been known ("How do you mend Ofsted?", February 12). I have argued that the people who should inspect schools and teachers should be outstanding headteachers and senior staff who are currently serving in successful schools. They are the ones who have credibility.

Professional pilots are arguably more rigorously and more frequently examined than teachers. I have a pal who is the senior training examiner for a major European airline. I spoke to a couple of senior captains who he had given a particularly gruelling time in the simulator. How realistic did they think the particular session was? "Oh, not at all," they said, "you'd never get all those emergencies altogether in a real flight ..."

So what did they think of my pal, the chief examiner? "Well, he has to assess us to see if we could cope with multiple emergencies, however unlikely," they said, before adding, "and anyway, he had to show he could do it himself when he was assessed just a month ago!"

Peter Stammers, Banstead, Surrey.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now