Sky-high ideals for inspection

26th February 2010 at 00:00

The problems of the Ofsted process and the lack of credibility of inspectors has long been known ("How do you mend Ofsted?", February 12). I have argued that the people who should inspect schools and teachers should be outstanding headteachers and senior staff who are currently serving in successful schools. They are the ones who have credibility.

Professional pilots are arguably more rigorously and more frequently examined than teachers. I have a pal who is the senior training examiner for a major European airline. I spoke to a couple of senior captains who he had given a particularly gruelling time in the simulator. How realistic did they think the particular session was? "Oh, not at all," they said, "you'd never get all those emergencies altogether in a real flight ..."

So what did they think of my pal, the chief examiner? "Well, he has to assess us to see if we could cope with multiple emergencies, however unlikely," they said, before adding, "and anyway, he had to show he could do it himself when he was assessed just a month ago!"

Peter Stammers, Banstead, Surrey.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today