Sourcing the sense of unreliability;Opinion;Letter

8th January 1999 at 00:00
IT IS not often that I find myself agreeing with Chris Woodhead. But, on the perceived reliability of national curriculum tests, I cannot help but do so.

They are perceived to be unreliable. Where I differ is in the source of that unreliability. Simply distrusting the integrity of teachers to administer the tests fairly is an affront to honest, hardworking teachers.

Commenting on the concepts of "levelness" I have some sympathy with this being the source of mistrust. Certainly when it comes to the transition from key stage 2 to 3, teachers do not trust that a level 5 at KS2 is the same as a level 5 at KS3.

Put simply, the KS2 level 5 relates to a narrower band of content than the KS3 level 5 and so is different in that respect, but has a comparable level of difficulty.

James D Williams Lecturer in science education Brunel University School of Education 300 St Margaret's Road Twickenham Middlesex

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today