Sourcing the sense of unreliability;Opinion;Letter

8th January 1999 at 00:00
IT IS not often that I find myself agreeing with Chris Woodhead. But, on the perceived reliability of national curriculum tests, I cannot help but do so.

They are perceived to be unreliable. Where I differ is in the source of that unreliability. Simply distrusting the integrity of teachers to administer the tests fairly is an affront to honest, hardworking teachers.

Commenting on the concepts of "levelness" I have some sympathy with this being the source of mistrust. Certainly when it comes to the transition from key stage 2 to 3, teachers do not trust that a level 5 at KS2 is the same as a level 5 at KS3.

Put simply, the KS2 level 5 relates to a narrower band of content than the KS3 level 5 and so is different in that respect, but has a comparable level of difficulty.

James D Williams Lecturer in science education Brunel University School of Education 300 St Margaret's Road Twickenham Middlesex

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now