Special needs betrayal

11th June 2004 at 01:00
To suggest that students with learning difficulties andor disabilities (LDD) are to have programmes of study removed or reduced is a callous act of negligence on the part of the Government and Learning and Skills Council ("Spectre of cash crisis", FE Focus May 28).

FE is one of many transition routes for students with LDD. For many with profound or severe needs (already a token group in some colleges) education of a liberal non-accredited nature combined with a package of social, leisure and recreation activities often provided by other agencies is a meaningful way to more independent, fulfilled lives.

If there is a reduction in this provision at a time when demand is increasing, then the LSC and government should be condemned. It would be a disgraceful act of betrayal and callous victimisation of a needy group of learners.

Len Parkyn

Head of Cherry Trees Further Education Centre Brighton and Hove City

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now