Split personnel;Letter

3rd April 1998 at 01:00
Mike Fielding sees middle management in schools in terms of implementation of the "vision" and of a "sensitive bridging of the gap between senior managers and the staff on the ground".

In order to discharge these functions their "best hope is teamwork". Cynicism is one of the "pitfalls" to be avoided.

The role thus represented is not "multiplicitous" but schizophrenic. The middle manager is expected to be an implementational cog in a bureaucratic machine, and then turn round and participate in sharing, caring collegiality in his or her own team. It is not cynicism to suggest that Mr Fielding is asking a great deal here.

His model works if middle management has a voice at the vision and policy stage, but this remains a missing link in his argument. To expect seasoned professionals merely to implement the decisions of others is bound to foster rather than erode the baronial mentality.

LIONEL WARNER, 10 Sunderland Close, Woodle, Berks

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today