SQA 'phoney' passes row

18th May 2001 at 01:00
UNIVERSITIES and colleges may be seriously misled by the value of a compensatory pass in this year's exams, Mike Russell, SNP education spokesman, claimed on Tuesday during MSPs' questioning of the Scottish Qualifications Authority.

The SQA has informed schools that students just failing at one course will be awarded a compensatory A pass at the level below. The ruling particularly applies to Higher students who pass the units but fail the external exam. They will now receive an A pass at Intermediate 2.

A consultation revealed support for changing the previous system which awarded a C pass at the lower level. Teachers felt this unfair.

Mr Russell, however, said there was concern among universities about the change. "This could be presented as a significant success when in reality it is a significant failure for a student," he said.

Judith Gillespie, parent member of the national qualifications steering group, believes universities and colleges were not fully involved in the decision which was devised ahead of the growth of Advanced Higher. Higher education had no time to change its system.

Mrs Gillespie said a student could fail the Advanced Higher exam and receive an A at Higher, the gold standard for university entrance. "A candidate who gets a B at Higher may be asked to get a B at Advanced Higher. If he or she just fails the final exam and gets a compensatory A award at Higher, they might leapfrog over a candidate who starts with a similar B grde at Higher and manages to get a C pass at Advanced Higher."

She also argues that the compensatory A pass misrepresents the skill level of the student who is not able to attain the basic course award at the next level. Mrs Gillespie does not recall a decision at the national steering group.

Bill Morton, SQA chief executive, told Mr Russell there had been a full consultation and there were no plans to reconsider.

David Caldwell, chief executive of Universities Scotland, said: "If what is happening is that people failing the Advanced Higher and failing narrowly have obtained the standard appropriate to band A at Higher, this ought not to be a problem. But there is a serious issue about whether that standard is being properly monitored. It's absolutely a standards issue."

Physics teachers are the latest group to add their voices to demands for changes to the internal assessment of their subject within the Higher Still programme. Thirty heads of departments in the east of Scotland have put their names to a petition protesting about the entire concept of internal assessment. The burden on pupils is heavy, they say, and the assessment of pupils' practical abilities is "flawed". The group also complain that "the teacher time required cannot be justified educationally".

Physics teachers decided to speak out following their final Higher Still training day on Tuesday. They said they had been calling for changes for several years and were ignored.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now