Summat's up

3rd November 1995 at 00:00
As I have spent considerable time trying to simplify needlessly complicated mathematical terminology, so that pupils can grasp the concept hidden behind the long words, I found Stuart Parker's call to introduce the "correct" terms in reception classes rather naive (TES, October 6).

I was amazed that in the same article he used the word "sum" with complete abandon (division sum, subtraction sum). If he advocates correct terminology from the start, then he ought not to use sum to mean anything but the result of addition.

I was also surprised to find that he regarded square centimetre as equivalent to centimetre squared and suggested one could just choose between them.

However: two centimetres squared equals four square centimetres, three centimetres squared equals nine square centimetres . . .

FRANCES ASHWORTH Mathematics adviser Dorset

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today